Legal Opinion

Anthony Accurso v. C. Rivers

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided October 29, 2025No. 3:23-cv-02888Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ANTHONY ACCURSO, § #28981-044, § Petitioner, § § v. § No. 3:23-cv-02888-X (BT) § C. RIVERS, § Respondent. § FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pro se petitioner Anthony Accurso seeks federal habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging the results of a disciplinary proceeding where the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) found him in possession of a “hazardous tool.” See ECF No. 3. (Petition)1. As explained below, the Court should DENY Accurso’s petition and DISMISS…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API