Legal Opinion

Changizi v. Department of Health and Human Services

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 5, 2022No. 2:22-cv-01776Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MARK CHANGIZI, et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-1776 Plaintiffs, JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al. Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This matter arises on Plaintiff Mark Changizi, Daniel Kotzin, and Michael Senger’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 9) and Motion for Limited Expedited Discovery, or, in the Alternative, to Exclude Defendants’ Evidence (the “Motion to Compel”) (ECF No. 27), to which Defendants…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API