Legal Opinion

Isler v. Isler

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1935Published

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

This is an application to reopen a divorce decree by way of supplemental cross-complaint, filed more than 10 years after entry of the decree, based on the claim that respondent Robert Isler had concealed some property from Freda Isler, the appellant, at the time they appeared in open court and agreed upon a settlement of their property rights in the year 1923.

The original suit was commenced by respondent Robert Isler in the circuit court of Multnomah county by filing a complaint for divorce June 26,1922, against Ms wife Freda Isler. Answer was filed January 23, 1923. Trial was had on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bamford v. BamfordOregon Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Smyth v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  3. Crews v. RichardsOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Lachele v. Oregon Realty Exchange Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Smith v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API