Lachele v. Oregon Realty Exchange Investment Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
The further and separate defense and set-off presented by the defendant was not tested either by demurrer or motion. Issue was joined thereon by a reply. For that reason we are not required to pass upon either the sufficiency or validity of setting up an action for malicious prosecution as a counterclaim to a complaint containing the ordinary allegations for the foreclosure of a real estate mortgage given to secure an ordinary promissory note. We seriously doubt that the allegations in the answer constitute a counterclaim to the complaint.
The motion for a new trial filed by the defendant was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crews v. RichardsOregon Supreme Court · 1887
- Seidel v. ChickOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Smith v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Shepherd's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of Verd Hill v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Lane County Escrow Service, Inc. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Waldow v. WaldowOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Mannix v. HarjuOregon Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.