Legal Opinion

Lachele v. Oregon Realty Exchange Investment Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

The further and separate defense and set-off presented by the defendant was not tested either by demurrer or motion. Issue was joined thereon by a reply. For that reason we are not required to pass upon either the sufficiency or validity of setting up an action for malicious prosecution as a counterclaim to a complaint containing the ordinary allegations for the foreclosure of a real estate mortgage given to secure an ordinary promissory note. We seriously doubt that the allegations in the answer constitute a counterclaim to the complaint.

The motion for a new trial filed by the defendant was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crews v. RichardsOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Seidel v. ChickOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Smith v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Shepherd's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Verd Hill v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Lane County Escrow Service, Inc. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Waldow v. WaldowOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Mannix v. HarjuOregon Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API