Legal Opinion
In re Amsterdam
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 2005PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Valerie S. Amsterdam was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on February 22, 1977. At all relevant times, she has maintained an office for the practice of law within this Department.
On April 4, 2005, before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, respondent, a criminal defense attorney, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States in violation of 18 USC §§ 371 and 3551. In addition, respondent entered into a stipulation of settlement under which she…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In re MargiottaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- In re MercadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re VagionisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
4Cited by24 opinions
- In re SorinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re ChristoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re GansmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re Hidetoshi ChoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.