Legal Opinion

Mull v. RIDGELAND REALTY, LLC

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 29, 2010No. 4663PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

In this case, we must determine whether the Special Referee erred in (1) refusing to set aside a default judgment due to insufficient service of process; (2) finding Ridgeland Realty, LLC (Ridgeland Realty) made a voluntary appearance under Rule 4(d), SCRCP, thereby waiving any defects in service of process; (3) failing to set aside the default judgment because the award was grossly out of proportion with the evidence of actual damages; and (4) granting relief that amounted to splitting attorneys’ fees with a layman. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY

a.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Hitachi Data Systems Corp. v. LeathermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Taylor v. MedenicaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SIB Development & Consulting, Inc. v. Save Mart SupermarketsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API