Legal Opinion
Hine v. Lausterer
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Charles B. Wheeler, Official Referee.
The plaintiff by this action seeks to charge the estate of William J. Lausterer and others *398and to make them account for certain alleged profits realized from the purchase by the Automatic Registering Machine Company of some 550 voting machines from the Empire Voting Machine Company, of which he was a director.
It becomes necessary to detail somewhat at length the history of the transactions out of which this litigation arises. The Empire Voting Machine Company as a corporation was engaged in the manufacture and sale of voting machines. Lausterer was a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Gamble v. Queens County Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Sage v. . CulverNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Munson v. Syracuse, Geneva & Corning R. R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mannheimer v. KeehnNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Knudsen v. BurdettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
- Hine v. LaustererAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Rosenfeld v. Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1955