Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Andrew Weir Insurance Company

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 6, 1957No. Civ. 8764PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action against four defendants, Excess Underwriters, Inc., a New York insurance agent and broker, Melling & Bevingtons, Ltd., a Canadian insurance agent and broker, and Andrew Weir Insurance Company, Ltd., and Prudential Assurance Company, Ltd., two British insurance companies, to recover a balance alleged to be due plaintiff for services rendered and expenses incurred in investigating and settling claims against the two insurance companies under policies issued by them to taxicab companies in Baltimore, Md., and Pittsburgh, Pa.

At the time the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Compania De Astral, S. A. v. Boston Metals Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  3. Johns v. Bay State Abrasive Products Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1950
  4. Thomas v. Hudson Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  5. Cole v. Randall Park Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Litsinger Sign Co. v. American Sign Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Mastel v. Miniclip SADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. Musse v. HayesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API