Legal Opinion

Ramsey, Jr. v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 4, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2013-1003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant’ to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 filed by Charles W. Ramsey, Jr. Mr. Ramsey seeks to terminate or, alternatively, to recalculate the terms of his parole. He alleges that the United States Parole Commission has improperly maintained parole authority over him, or that, at the very least, it has improperly calculated his parole term, in violation of a plea agreement reached with the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and in contravention of a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  2. Amin v. BarrDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  3. Knighten v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API