Legal Opinion

Holland v. Lansdowne-Moody Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 3, 1954No. 3179PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from a summary judgment granted under Rule 166-A, T.R.C.P. Parties will be referred to as in the trial court. Defendant, who is in the tractor business, sold one Hawkins a tractor in January 1952. The sale was evidenced by a combination note-mortgage called a “Purchase Agreement,” which recited a cash payment; a deferred balance to be paid in 18 monthly installments of $206 each; and which secured the balance by mortgage on the equipment. The mortgage provided for repossession with or without process of law by the seller or assignee in the event of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rolfe v. SwearingenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Fowler v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Groce v. P. B. Yates Mach. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Pittsburg Pipe & Supply Co. v. Federal MacHine & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cone v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Lotspeich v. Chance Vought AircraftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Lacy v. Carson Manor Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Farmers State Bank v. First State Bank of LibertyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. Nagelson v. Fair Park National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API