Legal Opinion

Cardiello v. Arbogast

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 14, 2012No. Nos. 2:12-cv-353, 2:12-cv-401, 2:12-cv-402PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT

TERRENCE F. McVERRY, District Judge.

Now pending before the Court are three1 related appeals from a Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by United States Bankruptcy Judge Bernard Marko-vitz on February 7, 2012. The genesis of the underlying dispute was the dissolution of the law firm of Titus and McConomy (“T & M”), and the resulting breach of its commercial lease over a dozen years ago. The debtor in this bankruptcy case, Thomas Arbogast, was a partner at T & M and is subject to a judgment in favor of the lessee (“Trizec”). In an attempt to enforce its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. FIDELITY BOND AND MORTG. CO. v. BrandDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Reitmeyer v. Meinen (In Re Meinen)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Fifth Third Bank v. Alexo (In Re Alexo)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shearer v. Oberdick (In re Oberdick)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Cohen v. SikiricaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Titus v. ShearerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Sikirica v. Wettach (In re Wettach)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Shearer v. Titus (In re Titus)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API