Legal Opinion
Seymour v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community Renewal
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 9, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Eileen Bransten, J.
Petitioner Julie Seymour brings this CPLR article 78 peti*997tion to annul a determination of the respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) which deregulated petitioner’s apartment pursuant to the luxury deregulation provisions of the Rent Regulation Reform Act of 1993 (L 1993, ch 253). The proceeding also seeks a declaration that the default procedure employed by DHCR is unconstitutional. DHCR cross-moves to dismiss the petition.
The facts of this case are undisputed. Ms. Seymour, a single working parent, resides with her…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eaton v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- County of Monroe Ex Rel. Monroe Community Hospital v. KaladjianNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Dowling v. HollandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Nick v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- 60 Gramercy Park Co. v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Elkin v. RoldanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Seymour v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999