Legal Opinion

Seymour v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered April 10, 1998, which, in a CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging respondent Division of Housing and Community Renewal’s (DHCR) luxury deregulation of petitioner tenant’s apartment, insofar as appealed from, ruled that DHCR had the authority to consider income verification information submitted by the tenant more than 60 days after DHCR’s request therefor, and remanded to DHCR in order for it to consider such information, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although the tenant failed to provide the income verification…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nick v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Pledge v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Bazbaz v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Elkin v. RoldanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Michelle S. v. Charles S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dworman v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API