Legal Opinion

Rich v. Belcher

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1931No. 21129PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. While the plaintiff in a suit in a justice’s court must set forth with some degree of certainty his cause of action (Thomas v. Forsyth Chair Co., 119 Ga. 693, 46 S. E. 869), technical pleading is not required (Fine v. Southern Express Co., 10 Ga. App. 161, 163, 73 S. E. 35; Cooney v. Foote, 15 Ga. App. 455, 83 S. E. 696). Accordingly, a liberal construction has been given § 4715 of the Civil Code (1910), and if the defendant in a justice’s court is informed of the nature of the plaintiff’s demand against him, the requirement of the code section is met. Kinney v. Kinney, 20 Ga. App. 816 (93…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schofield v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Manley v. Chamberlin-Johnson-Dubose Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Cooney v. FooteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  4. Kinney v. KinneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Fine & Brother v. Southern Express Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mather-Groover Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API