Legal Opinion
Packard v. Rockford Professional Basebal Club
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided May 4, 1993No. 2-92-0977PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE INGLIS
delivered the opinion of the court:
James and Lenore Packard (plaintiffs) appeal after the trial court dismissed counts V through XII of their third amended complaint against the Rockford Professional Baseball Club (the Club), Rock River Concessionaires, the Rockford Park District (the Park District), and Keith Keating. The Park District is the only defendant participating in the appeal. The two issues plaintiffs present for review can be consolidated to address the one main issue in this case: whether counts V through XII of their third amended complaint stated causes…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Burke v. 12 Rothschild's Liquor Mart, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Burdinie v. Village of Glendale HeightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Fancil v. Q.S.E. Foods, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Casey D. Stengel v. Raymond L. Belcher, Individually and as a Police Officer of the Policedepartment of the City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Court v. GrzelinskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Calloway v. KinkelaarIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Pechan v. Dynapro, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- State v. WilenNebraska Court of Appeals · 1995
- Wash. State Major League Baseball Stadium Pfd v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols-Kiewit Const. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
- Washington State Major League Baseball Stadium Public Facilities District v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols-Kiewit Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.