Legal Opinion
Sakyi v. Estee Lauder Cos.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 6, 2018No. Civil Action No. 17–1863 (BAH)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBeryl A. Howell, Chief Judge
Upon consideration of the plaintiff Princess Sakyi's Motion to Extend the Deadline for Class Certification ("Pl.'s Mot."), ECF No. 17, the memoranda submitted in support and opposition, and the entire record herein, the plaintiff's motion is GRANTED.
The plaintiff initiated this action, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, against defendants Estee Lauder Companies, Inc., Aveda Institute, Inc., Aveda Corporation, and Beauty Basics, Inc. (collectively, "defendants"), in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia on July 31, 2017, alleging unlawful and deceptive trade…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Smith v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Michael McCarthy Arthur Waskow v. Richard G. KleindienstCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- The Black Panther Party v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- In Re Vitamins Antitrust Class ActionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harriott v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019