Legal Opinion
Harriott v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 23, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2019-1656Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KENNETH HARRIOTT et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 19-1656 (TJK) WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) has moved to strike or dismiss Plaintiffs’ class allegations and to dismiss Count II of the Amended Complaint. WMATA argues that Plaintiffs failed to move for class certification within the time limit imposed by this Court’s Local Rules. WMATA also argues that it is immune from Plaintiffs’ age discrimination claims.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Sossamon v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.