Legal Opinion

People v. Wortman

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 1992No. E010174PublishedCited by 5 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DABNEY, J.

A jury convicted defendant Robert Wortman of count 1, forcible rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (a)(2)) 1 and count 2, forcible oral copulation (§ 288a, subd. (c)). The court found true the special allegations of a prior serious felony conviction (§ 667, subd. (a)) and a second felony conviction for which he had served a prison term (§ 667.5, subd. (b).) The court imposed an eight-year upper term for the rape, a consecutive five-year enhancement for the prior serious felony conviction, a consecutive one-year enhancement for the prior prison term, and a full consecutive…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. People v. CrouchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. People v. Asean D.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API