Legal Opinion

Howland v. Scott

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1932No. L. A. 11264; L. A. 11265; L. A. 11266PublishedCited by 2 opinions

M. W. Conkling and Salisbury & McNeil for Respondents.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A hearing was granted in these consolidated cases after decision by the District Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, because of a conflict in the views expressed therein with the opinion of the court in the related ease of Howland v. Lampton, 100 Cal. App. 462 [280 Pac. 173], Upon further consideration, we are satisfied with the correctness of the opinion by Mr. Presiding Justice Barnard in the cases consolidated herein, and we disapprove of any contrary conclusions which appear in Howland v. Lampton, supra. The opinion prepared' by Mr. Justice Barnard is hereby adopted as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hill v. FinniganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Tompkins v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Bradley Co. v. MulcrevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Howland v. LamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wagner v. ShaponaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Stewart v. WhitmyreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API