Legal Opinion

Fincher Ex Rel. Fincher v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 20, 2010No. 08-1109, 08-1159UnpublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

TERRENCE L. O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge.

On May 8, 1994, Appellant Kelly Finch-er, a pedestrian, was struck and severely injured by a vehicle. The driver was insured under an automobile liability insurance policy issued by Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Prudential”) in April 1992. In a prior appeal, we held Fincher was entitled to reformation of the policy because Prudential’s offer of additional or enhanced personal injury protection (APIP or “enhanced PIP”) benefits to its insured did not comply with the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act (CAARA),…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. J.B. Ex Rel. Hart v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. Eck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  4. Shook v. El Paso CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. Wankier v. Crown Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Scottsdale Insurance v. TolliverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. Valdez v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
  3. In re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
  4. Midland Pizza, LLC v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2011
  5. Drake v. Amerisure Partners Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API