Legal Opinion
In re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices Litigation
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 28, 2010No. MDL No. 1840; Case No. 07-1840-KHVPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*223 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring putative class action claims for damages and injunctive relief against motor fuel retailers in Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, the District of Columbia and Guam. Plaintiffs claim that because defendants sell motor fuel for a specified price per gallon without disclosing or adjusting for…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Robinson v. Metro-North Commuter R.R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Valley Drug Co. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Rutter & Wilbanks Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rushing v. Alon USA, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- In re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Roberts v. C.R. England, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2017
- Midland Pizza, LLC v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.