Securities & Exchange Commission v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) seeks to permanently enjoin defendants Bausch & Lomb, Inc. (“BOL”) and Daniel G. Schuman (“Schuman”) from violating § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“the 1934 Act”), (15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 CFR § 240.-10b-5).
Introduction
The broad anti-fraud provisions, § 10(b) of the 1934 Act and Rule 10b-5, are an essential part of American securities law. Section 10 declares it “unlawful for any person . (b) [t]o use or employ, in connection with…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,887 Sundstrand Corporation v. Sun Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,610 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gerson Blatt, Barton S. Udell, and John PullmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Arnold B. ELKIND, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. LIGGETT & MYERS, INC., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,186 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and Daniel G. SchumanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Collins Securities Corporation and Timothy Collins v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.