Legal Opinion

Martin v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1946No. Docket No. 37, Calendar No. 43,140PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.

This action is brought to recover for damage to plaintiff’s car and for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in a collision which occurred at the intersection of Elmhurst and Turner avenues in the city of Detroit at 3:06 p.m. on November 14, 1942, between the automobile owned and driven by plaintiff, and a bus operated by the defendant department of street railways of the city of Detroit. Trial was had by a jury and the verdict was for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,000. Decision on a motion for a directed verdict having been reserved under the Empson act, the trial judge entered a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Geeck v. LuckenbillMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Koehler v. ThomMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Rosenfeld v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Cline v. KillingbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Hickey v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Krause v. RyanMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bruer v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Krause v. RyanMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Krause v. RyanMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  5. MacDonald v. SkorniaMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API