Legal Opinion
DiPerna v. Chicago School of Professional Psychology
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 28, 2016No. Case No. 14-cv-57PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN W. DARRAH, United States District Court Judge
Plaintiff, Jennifer DiPema, filed a Second Amended Complaint against Defendant, the Chicago School of Professional *718Psychology, alleging breach of contract and negligence. Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [93] on all counts. For the reasons set forth more fully below, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [93] is granted in part and denied in part.
LOCAL RULE 56.1
Local Rule 56.1(a)(3) requires the moving party to provide “a statement of material facts as to which the party contends there is no genuine…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Michael B. Smith v. Douglas Lamz and the Village of Algonquin, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jennifer DiPerna v. Chicago School of ProfessionalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Board of Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund v. GossettDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Jennifer DiPerna v. Chicago School of ProfessionalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018