Legal Opinion

Madison Township v. Dunkle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1888No. 12,499PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The material allegations of the appellant’s complaint are these : That in 1874 the defendant was elected trustee of Madison township, and qualified according to law; that he resigned the office in September, 1877, and James S. McMurray was appointed his successor ; that after McMurray had qualified, he and Dunkle settled the accounts between Dunkle and the township, and ascertained that Dunkle was indebted to it in the sum of $2,056.71, and that he then executed to McMurray, as trustee, his note for that sum; that the note was executed “ as evidence of the indebtedness and for the purpose of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Union School Township v. National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Summers v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Bloomington School Township v. National School Furnishing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Sorden v. GatewoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
  5. Simpson v. . SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. HannaganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Citizens Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GardnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. American Surety Co. v. McKiearnanMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. GolomboskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  5. Tudryck v. MutchMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API