Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Burger King Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 24, 1981No. 77 Civ. 2140PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SIFTON, District Judge.
Defendant has timely applied pursuant to Rule 52(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an amendment to the findings of fact contained in the Memorandum Decision and Order filed herein on December 10, 1980, D.C., 504 F.Supp. 404. In addition, both parties have, pursuant to leave of Court, filed proposed forms of judgment which differ in significant respects and raise one of the issues presented by the Rule 52(b) motion. The Rule 52(b) motion is granted to the extent that the findings of fact and amplifications of such findings set forth…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Norwalk Core v. Norwalk Redevelopment AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Jack A. Doca and Fannie C. Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, S.A. And Pittston Stevedoring Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Joseph v. HDMJ Restaurant, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Donovan v. Sovereign Security, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Donovan v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Quintel Corp. v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Orshan v. MacChiarolaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.