Legal Opinion

Auto Credit of Nashville v. Wimmer

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2007PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · BarkerWilliam M. Barker, C.J.

in which JANICE M. HOLDER, CORNELIA A. CLARK, and GARY R. WADE, JJ., joined.

This case arises out of the financing and subsequent repossession of an automobile. After retaking possession of the collateral, the creditor sent written notification to the debtor that the automobile would be sold but that she could redeem the vehicle by paying the full amount owed. Although the debtor never received this notification, the creditor was unaware of that fact until after the sale of the vehicle. Because the sale price did not cover the amount owed on the vehicle, the creditor sought a deficiency…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eastman Chemical Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hawks v. City of WestmorelandTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Killingsworth v. Ted Russell Ford, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Lipscomb v. DoeTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. WallsTennessee Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by22 opinions

  1. Green v. GreenTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Waldschmidt v. Reassure America Life Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Brunswick Acceptance Co., LLC v. MEJ, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  4. In Re SpurgeonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2007
  5. Regions Bank v. Thomas D. ThomasTennessee Supreme Court · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API