Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lisa Karl v. Brazos River Authority

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided April 23, 2015No. 11-13-00010-CVPublished

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

MIKE WILLSON, JUSTICE

The majority holds that Lisa Karl was engaged in activity related to “swimming,” thus engaged in “swimming” and “recreation,” 1 when she fell and broke her ankle at the North Í) & D Public Use Area, a beach and swimming area on Possum Kingdom Lake owned by the Brazos River Authority,2' and' that the recreational use statute3 bars her negligence claim for her injuries.' I respectfully dissent because I would hold she was not engaged in recreation at the time of her injury.

I. Background Facts

Karl and her sister, along with their children, all rode in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Stephen F. Austin State University v. FlynnTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  4. City of Bellmead v. TorresTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. City of Lubbock v. Rule, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API