Legal Opinion

Stephen F. Austin State University v. Flynn

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2007No. 04-0515PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Medina

Chief Justice JEFFERSON, Justice O’NEILL, Justice BRISTER, Justice GREEN, and Justice JOHNSON joined, and in all but Part III of which Justice HECHT, Justice WAINWRIGHT, and Justice WILLETT joined.

This interlocutory appeal concerns a trial court’s order denying Stephen F. Austin State University’s (SFA) plea to the jurisdiction and motion to dismiss. The court of appeals affirmed the order, holding that the Texas Tort Claims Act waived SFA’s sovereign immunity and that the recreational use statute did not apply. 202 S.W.3d 167. Because we conclude that the recreational use statute does apply…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. County of Cameron v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. City of Brownsville v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. The City of Houston v. Steve WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. City of Waco v. KirwanTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Suarez v. City of Texas CityTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. City of Dallas v. Heard, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  5. Brookshire Katy Drainage District v. Lily Gardens, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API