Legal Opinion

Gomez v. Zamora

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 29, 1991No. 13-90-469-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HINOJOSA, Justice.

This is an appeal from a temporary injunction prohibiting appellants, Medical Assistance Program Advisors (MAPA) and Jeffrey Gomez (Gomez) from competing with appellee, Texas Aries Medical Social Services (TAMSS) and Humberto Zamora. The basis for the injunction was a non-competition clause in an employment contract appellant Gomez signed. We reverse and dissolve the injunction.

Appellee, TAMSS, is in the business of assisting hospitals in recovering money for medical services provided to indigent patients. 1 The money is granted by governmental entities and other…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Weatherford Oil Tool Company v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Martin v. Linen Systems for Hospitals, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  3. Gonzales v. Zamora, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  4. Garza v. City of Mission, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
  5. Valenzuela v. Aquino, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Butler v. Arrow Mirror & Glass, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
  2. Wright v. Sport Supply Group, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
  3. TransPerfect Translations, Inc. v. LeslieDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  4. Cobb v. Caye Publishing Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  5. Norlyn Enterprises, Inc. v. APDP, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API