Legal Opinion

M & J Services, Inc. v. Vmk, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1990No. 48A04-9004-CV-164PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHEZEM, Judge.

Case Summary

Plaintiffs-Appellants, M & J Services, Inc., Max and Jacquelyn Moon {collectively, "M & J"), appeal from the denial of their Motion to Correct Error. We reverse.

Issue

M & J presents one (1) issue for our review, which we restate as follows:

Whether the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to set aside the dismissal entered against M & J.

Facts and Procedural History

On March 15, 1989, M & J filed its Motion for Trial Setting. On the face of the motion is a hand-written notation which states "[tJalk to parties and schedule." On the same day, the trial court also…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Turner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Associates Financial Services Co. of Kentucky v. KnappIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Fineman v. CiticorpAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Spence v. Supreme Heating & Air Conditioning Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Patton Elec. Co., Inc. v. GilbertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore v. Terre Haute First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Salvino Verta v. Salvino PucciIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Tam v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Trojnar v. TrojnarIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API