Legal Opinion
Still v. Commanding Officer, U. S. Army Reserve Components Personnel Center
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided November 17, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 71-616PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
POINTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a Second Lieutenant in the U.S. Army Reserve, has had his call to active duty delayed for some three years while he attended law school. Claiming that opposition to war “coalesced” in early 1970, he submitted through appropriate military channels an application, dated December 16, 1970, for discharge as a “conscientious objector” (a “C.O.”) under Army Regulations 135-60. In this proceeding he ■ challenges the action taken by the military authorities on that application.
The Magistrate, to whom the complaint was initially referred by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ahrens v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Schlanger v. SeamansSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albert H. Carter v. Robert Seamans, Jr., as Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- McQueary v. LairdCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Julita David Robertson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilson Edward Still, Jr. v. Commanding Officer, U. S. Army Reserve Components Personnel CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972