North Cherokee Village Membership v. Murphy
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtD. C. Riley, J.
We are asked to decide whether a restrictive covenant banning "house trailers and tents” can be interpreted to include within its prohibition the placement of a "double-wide” mobile home on appellants’ lot.
Appellants’ deed, like those of all other property owners in the North Cherokee Village subdivision, contains the following restrictive covenant:
*594"No house trailers or tents allowed on subdivision.”
Aware of the restriction, appellants consulted their real estate agent and township officials to ask whether a "double-wide” mobile home would fall within the language of the covenant. In…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Timmerman v. GabrielMontana Supreme Court · 1970
- Zmotony v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Hussey v. RayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Bullock v. KattnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Crawford v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kinchen v. LaytonMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Rofe v. RobinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Daniel v. GallowayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Tucker v. WolfeColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Sylvan Glens Homeowners Ass'n v. McFaddenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.