Legal Opinion

North Cherokee Village Membership v. Murphy

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1976No. Docket 23165PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtD. C. Riley, J.

We are asked to decide whether a restrictive covenant banning "house trailers and tents” can be interpreted to include within its prohibition the placement of a "double-wide” mobile home on appellants’ lot.

Appellants’ deed, like those of all other property owners in the North Cherokee Village subdivision, contains the following restrictive covenant:

*594"No house trailers or tents allowed on subdivision.”

Aware of the restriction, appellants consulted their real estate agent and township officials to ask whether a "double-wide” mobile home would fall within the language of the covenant. In…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Timmerman v. GabrielMontana Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Zmotony v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hussey v. RayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Bullock v. KattnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Crawford v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kinchen v. LaytonMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Rofe v. RobinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Daniel v. GallowayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Tucker v. WolfeColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Sylvan Glens Homeowners Ass'n v. McFaddenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API