Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Batteaste

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 3, 1984No. 82-1191PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals, 449 So.2d 797, in which the court decided the trial judge did not err when he permitted the jury, over objection of the defendant, to view the defendant's face to see if he had a scar on it.

The Court of Criminal Appeals, while acknowledging that it is error to reopen a case and allow presentation of evidence after a case has been submitted to the jury, nevertheless found that granting the jury's request to view the appellant's scar did not amount to a reopening of the evidence because the appellant had been present…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jolly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  2. Harnage v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Batteaste v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  2. Self v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  3. Caver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  4. Washington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Batteaste v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API