Legal Opinion

Washington v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 2005No. 00-CF-613PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, Associate Judge.

This case raises the question as to whether the trial court erred when it allowed the jury, during its deliberations and over defense counsel’s objection, to view appellant Yogi Washington up close, and at multiple angles, where the defendant had not been similarly shown to the jury during the trial. We hold that the trial court did not err in allowing the jury, at its request, to view Mr. Washington in this manner, and that their close-up view of Mr. Washington did not constitute “new evidence” requiring the trial court to reopen the case.

FACTUAL SUMMARY

At Mr.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. United States v. Hugo RinconCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Johnaton Sampson GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carey Antonio PIERCE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  3. Washington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API