Legal Opinion

Watwood v. Credit Bureau, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1949No. 859PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In our previous opinion in this case1 we held that appellant’s complaint for libel did not state a cause of action, and we therefore affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of such complaint. One of the errors assigned was the trial court’s failure to grant her leave to amend. That issue was not decided by this court; we merely pointed out that no request for leave to amend had been made in the trial court.

Appellant filed a motion for reconsideration, and we allowed oral argument thereon with particular reference to whether the trial court should have granted leave to amend the complaint and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watwood v. Credit Bureau, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Evans v. SchleinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Quick v. ParegolDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scrushy v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  2. Ridgewells Caterer, Inc. v. NelsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988
  3. Watwood v. Credit Bureau Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Scrushy v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API