Kope v. Columbia River Interstate Bridge Commission
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The purpose of this action was to recover damages for personal injuries. Some time after the summons and a copy of the original complaint were served, an amended complaint was served. To the amended complaint, a demurrer was interposed and sustained. The plaintiff refused to plead further, and elected to stand upon the amended complaint. Judgment was entered dismissing the action, from which plaintiff appeals.
The facts necessary to he stated in order to present the question to be determined are very few. The action was one against Clark county. The appellant was injured June 11, 1926. He…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hanford v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Lara v. SandellWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Bullock v. Yakima Valley Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Blalock v. CondonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Cresswell v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex. Rel. Wash. Nav. Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Miles v. Chinto Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
- McDonald v. Camas Prairie RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Cook v. Clallam CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Jessup v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972