Legal Opinion

Proper v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1904No. Docket No. 9PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Hillsdale; Chester, J. Case by William E. Proper and Walter G-. Proper, administrators of the estate of George W. Proper, deceased, against the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company, for the alleged negligent killing of plaintiffs’ intestate. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiffs’ intestate was -instantly killed by the defendant’s passenger train at a street crossing in the village of Jonesville. At the time he was driving in a buggy, and his horse was struck when he had but just stepped his fore feet upon the track. The action is case for negligence, and the case was left to the jury, who found a verdict for the defendant, and plaintiffs have appealed.

The claim was made by defendant’s counsel upon the trial that the deceased supported the widow from interest earned by his accumulated property, and not from his personal earnings; and the judge was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shufelt v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Tucker v. Chicaco & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Britton v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Braudy v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Osborn v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Folkmire v. Michigan United Railways Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Hope v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API