Legal Opinion

United States v. Briggs

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided June 12, 1998No. 97-0202; Crim.App. No. 31858PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Chief Judge:

Appellant challenges his convictions,1 alleging that Article 46, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 846, and Brady v. Maryland,2 entitled him to receive all of his rape victim’s medical records prior to her cross-examination.3

First, Briggs’ defense counsel orally requested copies of all the victim’s medical records, including any mental-health records. In response, the Government produced cop*144ies of the few pages of medical entries directly related to the charged incident. Immediately following receipt of these limited entries, the defense made…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. GarriesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. SimmonsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  4. United States v. BriggsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  2. United States v. BarronCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  3. United States v. RodriguezNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
  4. United States v. Sergeant ROBERTO E. TRIGUEROSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2010
  5. United States v. MontgomeryArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API