Legal Opinion

Rubin v. Empire Mutual Insurance

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided December 4, 1967PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarry Gittleson, J.

This action was submitted to me upoh atl agfeed statement of facts.

The issue herein is whether the medical payitteht provisions of the insurance policy issued by defendant provide coverage when plaintiff was entitled to workmen’s compensation and payments were made thereunder On his bebalf for medical care and attention.

The policy provides in part Us follows:

“ Coverage C — Medical payments: To pay all reasonable expenses incurred within one year from the date of accident for necessary medical, surgical, X-ray and dental services, including prosthetic devices, and necessary ambulance,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Auerbach v. . Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. United States v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  3. Bonney v. CITIZENS'MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Wenthe v. Hospital Service, Incorporated, of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchilanskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wierbinski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Rubin v. Empire Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API