Legal Opinion

J. H. Wilkes & Co. v. Arthur

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 27, 1912No. 8162PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Before Watts, .J., Union, June, 1911. Action- by J. H. Wilkes & Company et al. against B. E. Arthur et al. Nearly all the defendants appeal. Mr. Johnson cites: Passing of title on sale of personal property depends on intention of parties: 33 Am.

Read the full summary

Before Watts, .J., Union, June, 1911. Action- by J. H. Wilkes & Company et al. against B. E. Arthur et al. Nearly all the defendants appeal. Mr. Johnson cites: Passing of title on sale of personal property depends on intention of parties: 33 Am. St. R. 810; 67 S. C. 377. Judgment for full liability against stockholders should be entered on assessments made thereon: 79 S. C. 9. Liability of transferee of stock: 55 S. C. 87; 67 S. C. 386; 50 Fed. 394. : Proof of books: 3 Rich. 353; 38 S. C. 274; 15 S. C. 376; 41 S. C. 149; 14 S. C. 450; 109 Mass. 464; 4 Seld'. 170; 2 Hill 537; 55 N. Y. 441; 73…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion-of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

This is an action by J. H-Wilkes & Co., King Hardware Company and Lady Schumpert as plaintiffs, (of whom Lady Schumpert is the only party respondent), against B. F. Arthur, and numerous other parties, named as stockholders of the Peoples- Bank, an insolvent corporation heretofore doing business, at Union, S. C. The action was brought by the plaintiffs, in behalf of themselves, and all other depositors of the Peoples Bank, who might join with them and contribute to the expenses of ¡the suit, to enforce the statutory liability of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. J. H. Wilkes & Co. v. ArthurSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. American Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Cooper v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API