Legal Opinion

Bennett v. American Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 20, 1926No. Nos. 5174, 5175PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

The ruling announced in the first headnote does not require elaboration.

It remains to consider the case as made by the answer in the nature of a cross-petition. This counter-claim related to the same statutory liability for the benefit of depositors, to which the execution issued by the superintendent of banks referred. It was insisted that the office of superintendent of banks being a creature of the statute, and the statute having provided, in section 20 of article 7, a remedy by issuance of execution, to be employed by the superintendent of banks in collecting the statutory liability, that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bennett v. WheatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Ullman v. Brunswick Title Guarantee & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Wheatley v. GloverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. State v. Western & Atlantic R.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Lamar v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Citizens Bank v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  2. Gormley v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Mobley v. Macon National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  4. Mobley v. Macon National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Gormley v. ShiverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API