Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 8, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00041Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESUS ALFREDO RAMIREZ Case No.: 18-CR-4217-JO 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PURSUANT TO

28 U.S.C. § 2255

15 Respondent. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Petitioner filed this

28 U.S.C. § 2255

motion on January 9, 2023, asking the Court 23 to vacate or reduce his sentence because he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Dkt. 24 339 (“§ 2255 Mot.”). Specifically, Petitioner contends that his counsel acted unreasonably 25 in the following ways: (1)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Hendricks v. CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API