Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. Belote
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from Fulton superior court—Judge Pendleton. June 23, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.
It is conceded in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error that the plaintiff “introduced- some testimony to substantiate her case;” and it appears from an examination of the brief of evidence that this admission was not improvidently made. The general grounds of the motion for a new trial are therefore without merit.
1. The first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial is that the court instructed the jury that the plaintiff “charges that the defendant company was negligent in three particulars: First, it was negligent because it had no headlight. Second, it was negligent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brunswick & Western Railroad v. WigginsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Haiman & Brother v. Moses & GerrardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. NewmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Gainesville & Northwestern Railroad v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. AttawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Southern Railway Company v. Mrs. Mary I. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Wilson v. RayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Mixon v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Hodge v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1969
- Starks v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.