Legal Opinion

Freedman v. Freedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 26, 1995PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly S. Cohen, J.), entered October 12, 1993, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate the separation agreement and granted plaintiff’s cross-motion to confirm the Referee’s report and dismiss the application, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The law is established that "where questions of fact are submitted to a referee, it is the function of the referee to determine the issues presented, as well as to resolve conflicting testimony and matters of credibility, and generally courts will not disturb the findings of a referee” so long as his or her…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kardanis v. VelisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Slater v. Links at North HillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Muir v. CuneoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Preferred Group of Manhattan, Inc. v. Fabius Maximus, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Kiperman v. SteinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Board of Managers of the Boro Park Village-Phase I Condominium v. Boro Park Townhouse AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API