Legal Opinion
Muir v. Cuneo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 27, 1999PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring the rights and liabilities of the respective parties pursuant to a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lawlor, R.), dated September 29, 1998, as, in effect, upon granting their motion for reargument, adhered to the original determination in an amended report of the same Referee dated June 13, 1996, and directed that the defendant Walter Cuneo receive $445,555.36 being held in an escrow account.
Ordered…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kardanis v. VelisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Freedman v. FreedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Muir v. CuneoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Falcone v. FalconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
3Cited by8 opinions
- Broderson v. ParsonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Guaman v. TranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Gamman v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Broderson v. ParsonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.