Sladek v. Wilhelm

Plaintiff appeals from the denial of a new trial by the trial court following a jury verdict of no cause of action.

After a careful review of the record, we conclude that the jury verdict was not contrary to the great weight of the evidence.

The plaintiffs second issue is stated as follows: Did the trial court commit error in allowing defendant’s counsel to elicit testimony from the plaintiff that a year before the accident in question he had been involved in another accident with an automobile while riding his bicycle?

The plaintiff is objecting to the following testimony elicited by defense…