Legal Opinion
Conrad v. Hinman
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 1984PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Thomas J. Murphy, J.
By notice of motion dated November 18, 1983, petitioners above named move for a judgment directing respondents to rescind the zoning variance granted to Robert R. Murray and Mildred Murray on October 3, 1983, and reversing and annulling any alleged determination, and determining that no valid action was taken by a properly constituted Board of Trustees of the Village of Mexico.
For the following reasons set forth in this decision, the court grants petitioners’ motion.
The petitioners are owners of land and buildings in the Village of Mexico, State of New…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Tuxedo Conservation & Taxpayers Ass'n v. Town BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Webster Associates v. Town of WebsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Tuxedo Conservation & Taxpayers Ass'n v. Town BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Concerned Citizens Against Crossgates v. Town of Guilderland Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by16 opinions
- Informal Opinion No., New York Attorney General Reports1989
- Informal Opinion No., New York Attorney General Reports1989
- Informal Opinion No., New York Attorney General Reports1989
- Informal Opinion No., New York Attorney General Reports1987
- Informal Opinion No., New York Attorney General Reports1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.