Legal Opinion
Vickery v. Village of Saugerties
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 2, 1985PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs. The Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion as a matter of law (see, Matter of City of New York [James St.], 21 NY2d 293; see also, Amsterdam Sav. Bank v City View Mgt. Corp., 45 NY2d 854).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Amsterdam Savings Bank v. City View Management Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- In re the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
3Cited by119 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Andrea Dworkin Priscilla Moree Judith Fouts v. Hustler Magazine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Taylor v. MetzgerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- John P. Mack v. United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Turley v. ISG Lackawanna, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.