Zeidler v. Knights of Columbus
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, J.:
This is an action in which the plaintiff, as an associate member of a fraternal benefit society, i. e., The Knights of Columbus, a corporation, is seeking to have this court supervise, direct, and control disciplinary proceedings instituted against him by that organization for improper conduct under purported authority of its constitution and by-laws. The appeal is from a ruling of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s amended petition.
The amended petition, hereinafter referred to as the petition, is lengthy and in such form…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reno Lodge No. 99 v. Grand LodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Wichita Council No. 120 v. Security Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Modern Woodmen of America v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Radio Station KFH Co. v. Musicians Ass'n, Local No. 297Supreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- Moore v. National Council of the Knights & Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hill v. Prince Hall Grand LodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Johnson v. Prince Hall Grand LodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958